Maggie Spencer-Pick - outside reading reflection 11/29
I recently re-read part of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, and was again amazed by the profoundness of her writing. The actions that we take have consequences. We learn this as a child, right? Why is it that money and power become convoluted to support actions that are damaging? Why is it that humans are so quick to alter the environment in service of ourselves without further considering literally every other living thing on the planet?
I also think that Carson's understanding and explanation of the difference of time scales and concentrations in nature is interesting and provides a good crossover for environmental ethics. Pesticides aren't chemicals that go away quickly. They stay in the environment for a very long time. While they are technically naturally occurring chemicals and compounds, putting them into so many different ecological systems at such high concentrations is highly damaging. And they stay damaging for a long time. The use of pesticides is the reason that the bald eagle, a symbol of America, was placed on the endangered species list, because the large buildup of these chemicals ultimately weakened bird egg shells and no new birds were being born. These chemicals that were used to fight polio and increase crop yields ultimately impacted so much life outside of its intended insect targets.
Comments
Post a Comment